Mexico’s attempt to hold American gun companies accountable for arms trafficking has been unanimously dismissed by the U.S. Supreme Court. The highest court overturned a lower court’s decision that had allowed the lawsuit against Smith & Wesson and Interstate Arms to proceed, citing the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act.
The lawsuit, filed in Boston, alleged that the gun companies deliberately maintained a distribution system that enabled “straw purchasers” to acquire weapons ultimately destined for Mexican cartels. Mexico sought both financial damages and a court order to compel the companies to implement measures to counteract the “public nuisance” their products allegedly created.
However, the Supreme Court’s decision, authored by Justice Elena Kagan, stated that Mexico’s complaint did not “plausibly plead” that the companies engaged in such conduct. This ruling underscores the broad immunity provided to gun companies from liability for crimes committed with their products.
The outcome of this case holds significant weight for the diplomatic relationship between the U.S. and Mexico, as both nations grapple with complex issues like drug trafficking, immigration, and economic cooperation. Mexico has consistently argued that the influx of US-made firearms directly contributes to its internal security challenges.